No phone number, ever. We never sell your info.Answers before any sign-up.Your home record is yours. Export any time, free.Every number shows its source and date.
§ 02 Metro

What homeowners actually paid for landscaping or a sprinkler system in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA

Check a quote for this job

Landscaping or a sprinkler system ran 24% above the national median in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, where hired owners reported $3,600 (US: $2,900), about $3,960 in today's dollars. Prices here spread widely, from $1,500 at the 25th percentile to $8,000 at the 75th (5.3×, n=72), so scope matters more than the median. Its median ranks 4 of 17 metros with enough records. Do-it-yourselfers here reported $1,000 (n=39).

AHS 2023 · metro · hired n=72

Hired owners, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA

middle half of what owners paid
$1,65025th
$3,960median
$8,79075th
Wide scope. The 75th percentile is 5.3× the 25th, so Quote Check shows this job as context and does not place a single quote on it.
Who did the workn10th25thMedian75th90th
Hired a pro72$770$1,650$3,960$8,790$21,990
Did it themselves39$220$550$1,100$1,540$4,400
Everyone111$440$1,100$2,200$4,400$16,490

Today's dollars: survey amounts × CPI-U 334.980 (Aug 2026) ÷ 304.702 (2023 average), rounded to $10.

Compared with the nation · today’s $

San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA vs United States

Local median$3,960
US median$3,190
Local spread5.3×
US spread4.2×

Self-reported, nominal dollars, scope varies. Data: AHS 2023 National PUF.

Other metros

FAQ

Questions

How much did landscaping or a sprinkler system cost in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA?

Hired owners there reported a median of $3,600 (about $3,960 in Aug 2026 dollars), with the middle half between $1,500 and $8,000, from 72 survey records.

How reliable is a local figure?

It rests on 72 records, fewer than the national 1,145, so treat it as a rough local reading. Quote Check uses this metro row for the position because it has at least 50 records.

Can I see where my quote falls?

Only as context: the spread here is 5.3×, too wide to place one quote meaningfully.